{"id":4004,"date":"2016-12-06T14:09:45","date_gmt":"2016-12-06T19:09:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/?p=4004"},"modified":"2019-09-18T10:25:32","modified_gmt":"2019-09-18T14:25:32","slug":"uss-defender-mcm-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/2016\/12\/06\/uss-defender-mcm-2\/","title":{"rendered":"USS Defender (MCM-2)"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure style=\"width: 298px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/9\/9f\/USS_Defender_%28MCM-2%29.jpg\/1920px-USS_Defender_%28MCM-2%29.jpg\" width=\"298\" height=\"196\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">USS Defender (MCM-2)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The USS Defender (MCM-2) was a naval Avenger-class mine countermeasures ship constructed at Marinette Mariner Corp. In Marinette Wisconsin.\u00a0 The USS Defender was the second of 14 new Avenger class mine countermeasures ships designed to be used as ocean minesweepers assisting US naval fleet operations around the globe. [6] \u00a0The development of the Avenger Class ships came about as the United States Navy began in the 1980s to develop their mine countermeasures program to improve mine-warfare capabilities which would make amphibious assaults more accessible and provide the US Navy access to currently restricted waters around the globe.\u00a0 This development produced two new classes of ships, the Avenger as well as the Cardinal class, as well as mine-sweeping helicopters and three new mine types. [6]<\/p>\n<p>The formal commencement of construction for the USS Defender was on December 1<span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">,\u00a0<\/span>1983 and it was later completed and launched on April 4<span style=\"font-size: 13.3333px;\">,<\/span>\u00a01987. \u00a0The USS Defender was 224 ft long, the hull was constructed of laminated wood structure with composite fiberglass exterior sheathing.\u00a0 The reason for using this material in the hull was due to the fact that wood and glass have low magnetic and acoustic signatures and are strong yet lightweight and capable of withstanding blasts from detonated mines. [8] When the ship was fully loaded it weighed in at 1250 long tons.\u00a0 The ship is powered by four main diesel propulsion Waukesha L-1616 engines and carries surface search radar and variable-depth mine hunting sonar.\u00a0 Armament Included six 50 cal. Machine guns, four 7.62mm machine guns and two Mk 19 grenade launchers. [8] The Avenger class ships were to crew 6 officers and 76 enlisted. With all of this intact the USS Defender, like the other Avenger class naval ships, was capable of hunting down, classifying, and destroying naval mines. [6]<\/p>\n<p>On October, 2014 the USS Defender was officially decommissioned after 25 years of service. The USS Defender was assigned four different home ports in its time in service, Little Creek, VA, Ingleside, TX, San Diego, CA, and Sasebo, Japan.\u00a0 Serving from these four home ports allowed the Defender to participate in deployments with the United States Naval 3<sup>rd<\/sup>, 6<sup>th<\/sup>, and 7<sup>th<\/sup> fleets.\u00a0\u00a0 Throughout its lifetime the USS Defender took part in multiple NATO exercises, assisted in a Search and Rescue operation, responded to a distress call saving the lives of eight civilians, assisted in the post Hurricane Katrina efforts, took part in countless training exercises, received four Battle \u2018E\u2019 Awards, and two Secretary of the Navy letters of commendation. [2]<\/p>\n<p>In February 1993 the USS Defender left its home port of Ingleside, Texas and deployed to the United States 6<sup>th<\/sup>\u00a0Fleet area of responsibility.\u00a0 While on this 6-month deployment the USS Defender participated in two NATO Exercises, Blue Harrier &#8217;93 and Linked Seas &#8217;93. \u00a0NATO operation Linked Seas &#8217;93 was a large scale, ten day exercise near Lisbon, Portugal between the north of Portugal and the Strait of Gibraltar. [7] \u00a0Twelve nations participated sending thousands of men, 66 vessels, and 25 types of aircraft to prepare naval and air forces for rapid deployment of peacekeeping missions. \u00a0The exercise specifically centered on training to combat air, surface, and submarine warfare.\u00a0 The USS Defender&#8217;s objective was specifically to help pursue anti-mine warfare tactics. [7]<\/p>\n<p>Again in 1995 the USS Defender deployed from Ingleside on a five month deployment to the US 6<sup>th<\/sup> Fleet of Operations in which it once again participated in NATO Exercise Blue Harrier &#8217;95 and also participated in Alcudra &#8217;95.\u00a0 The Blue Harrier Nato exercise was a mine countermeasures exercise for mine-warfare that took place off the coast of Denmark in the Baltic-Approaches that incorporated the participation of seven nations.\u00a0 During its participation in Blue Harrier 95\u2019 the USS Defender was assigned to the United Kingdom Naval Squadron MCM 1 and exceptionally cleared its assigned area receiving a 24-hour port stay as a reward for its performance.\u00a0 Later in the exercise the Defender worked with the HMS Ledbury to clear a nasty minefield.\u00a0 Initially the efforts were discouraging but the USS Defender was eventually able to clear the field and complete the exercise with a perfect record. [3] \u00a0Later that year the Defender joined with the USS Warrior met with the Standing Naval Force Channel in Palma de Mallorca for NATO exercise Alcudra &#8217;95.\u00a0 The Alcudra exercise was new to the USS Defender and its crew as it was tasked with team mine-sweeping.\u00a0 Although a new experience, the Defender held its own as it successfully swept all three of the moored mines (mines set to float just below the surface of the water) in its assigned area. \u00a0The exercise finished after switching focus to hunting bottom mines, a task in which one of the Defender&#8217;s engines was terminally damaged due to a crack the block.\u00a0 Alcudra &#8217;95 was the final major task undertaken by the Defender in this trip out to the 6<sup>th<\/sup>\u00a0Fleet area of operation. It joined with three other MCM\u2019s to make the journey back to the United States. [3]<\/p>\n<p>In 1996 the USS Defender got to use its mine-countermeasure capabilities to assist the USS Gladiator in responding to an emergency Coast Guard search and rescue call of a downed Navy T-44 aircraft.\u00a0 \u00a0The decision was made to utilize the ship&#8217;s sonar in the search effort and the USS Defender was ultimately the ship to determine the location of the downed aircraft. [5] Over the next few years Defender participated in Gulf of Mexico Exercises (GOMEX) 97-2, 98-1, 00-1, and 02-4 a quarterly exercise for mine countermeasure units in the Gulf of Mexico to bring air, surface, and underwater MCM units together to prepare for battle group fleet operations. [9] \u00a0Defender also participated in Squadron Exercises 98-1, RONEX 00-1 and RONEX 02-1.\u00a0 Also during this time the the USS Defender continued to participate in NATO and mine warfare readiness group exercises, as well as making numerous port visits all over the eastern coast of the US, Canada, and the Great Lakes region of the United States. [4]<\/p>\n<p>In 2004 the Defender deployed from Ingleside to serve in the 3<sup>rd<\/sup>\u00a0Fleet area of responsibility. While on this deployment the USS Defender took part in the multinational exercise titled Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) 2004. \u00a0The purpose of RIMPAC, which was a mass joint operation involving seven nations and 18,000 military members near the Hawaiian Islands was to improve multinational cooperation and cohesion. [10] Forty ships between the seven nations combined to test and enhance their capabilities in their respected fields from nuclear-powered carriers to minesweeping ability.\u00a0 The members of the RIMPAC 2004 operation team up to improve allied abilities in continuing the fight on terrorism from testing amphibious assaults to sinking enemy vessels.\u00a0 RIMPAC 2004 was the 19<sup>th<\/sup> instalment of the event which first occurred in 1971. [10]<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 150px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/b\/be\/USS_Defender_MCM-2_Crest.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/b\/be\/USS_Defender_MCM-2_Crest.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">USS DEFENDER (MCM-2) Badge (Retrieved From Wikipedia.org)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In 2005 the ship and crew took part in Hurricane Katrina relief efforts helping to locate debris near New Orleans.\u00a0 The \u00a0USS Defender working alongside the USS Gladiator, USS Scout, USS Falcon, and, the Helicopter Mine Countermeasures \u00a0Squadron began operations on September 10, 2005 to employee their sonar and sweeping tools to assist in surveying \u00a0938 nautical miles near the Louisiana coast and the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port (LOOP) which handled 13 percent of \u00a0the nation\u2019s foreign oil. [1] The purpose of using mine countermeasure ships and teams was to locate any leaks and then \u00a0evaluate the associated environmental impacts.\u00a0 After completing this task the Defender switched focus to the transit \u00a0lanes of the Gulf Coast to clear waters to a depth of 65ft and locate anything hazardous to shipping lines like sunken or \u00a0submerged boats, buses, or houses that may have been left there in the waste of the storm. [1]<\/p>\n<p>On June 3, 2009 the USS Defender began the next and final stage of its life as it was offloaded from the heavy lift ship Condock IV at Fleet Activities Sasebo, Japan which became its new home port later that year in December. In October 2009 the Defender became the first US Navy ship to visit Miyanoura, Yakushima, Kagoshima Prefecture while on a 3-day port visit at the island which is located 225 miles south of the Japanese Mainland.\u00a0 While at this home port Defender participated in multiple training exercise and made multiple extended trips on Pacific patrol before finally departing the Sasebo, Japan for the final time on July 12, 2014. [4]<\/p>\n<p>The final journey for the USS Defender took the ship and crew from Sasebo, Japan back to San Diego, California in which it was officially decommissioned on October 1, 2014, ending its 25 years of service.\u00a0 In its time in service the USS Defender had 18 different commanding officers, participated in NATO exercises, naval training exercises, search and rescue, port visits, and the Hurricane Katrina relief effort to highlight a few of the major activities.\u00a0 Defender also received four Battle \u201cE\u201d Awards which are also known as the Battle Effectiveness Award.\u00a0 This award is granted to a ship that shows \u201csustained superior performance in an operational environment, and sustained continuous readiness throughout the Fleet Response Training Plan (FRTP).\u201d The United States Navy goes on to explain the Battle \u201cE\u201d Award as \u201can award for being the best ship in the organization.\u201d [11] Along with these awards came two secretary of the Navy letters of Commendation.\u00a0 Despite the 25 years of service for the United States of America, the USS Defender, like many old pieces of unused equipment, it was dismantled and disposed of by scrapping. [2] \u00a0The ship&#8217;s disposal officially brought the ship full circle from its creation in Marinette, Wisconsin to ending its life in San Diego, California.<\/p>\n\n<p>Primary Sources<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>1.\u00a0Journalist 1st Class (SW\/AW) Katrin Albritton, U.S. Fleet Forces Command Public Affairs. (2005) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.navy.mil\/submit\/display.asp?story_id=20108\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">&#8220;Defender Clears Way for Shipping off Gulf Coast.&#8221;<\/a>\u00a0U.S. Navy.<\/li>\n<li>2. Mass Communication Specialist 3<sup>rd<\/sup> Class, Minto, Conor. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.navy.mil\/submit\/display.asp?story_id=83639\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201cDefender Decommissioned After 25 Years of Service.\u201d<\/a> U.S. Navy.<\/li>\n<li>3. Commanding Officer, USS DEFENDER (MCM 2). <a href=\"https:\/\/www.history.navy.mil\/content\/dam\/nhhc\/research\/archives\/command-operation-reports\/ship-command-operation-reports\/d\/defender-mcm-2\/pdfs\/1995.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201cCommand History 1995-1996.\u201d<\/a> Department of the Navy, USS DEFENDER (MCM-2), pp. 3.<\/li>\n<li>4.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.uscarriers.net\/mcm2history.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201cUSS DEFENDER MCM 2.\u201d<\/a> US Carriers.<\/li>\n<li>5. Commanding Officer, MCMROTCREW ALFA. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.history.navy.mil\/content\/dam\/nhhc\/research\/archives\/command-operation-reports\/ship-command-operation-reports\/g\/gladiator-mcm-11-iii\/pdf\/1996.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201cCommand History for 1996.\u201d<\/a> Department of the Navy, MCMROTCREW ALFA, pp. 15.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Secondary Sources<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>6.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/services.lib.mtu.edu:2058\/docview\/206302614\/B72E9F2FADAD438EPQ\/1?accountid=28041\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Mine warfare upgrading is planned.<\/a> (1985). <i>Marine Corps Gazette (Pre-1994), <\/i><i>69<\/i>(1), 4.<\/li>\n<li>7.\u00a0Hatton, Barry (1993).\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.upi.com\/Archives\/1993\/05\/08\/Huge-Nato-exercise-rehearses-peace-keeping-missions\/8557736833600\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Huge Nato Exercise Rehearses Peace-Keeping Missions.<\/a> United Press International<\/li>\n<li>8.\u00a0Office of Corporate Communication, Naval Sea Systems Command. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.navy.mil\/navydata\/fact_display.asp?cid=4200&amp;tid=1900&amp;ct=4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201cMine Countermeasures Ships \u2013 MCM.\u201d<\/a> U.S. Navy Fact File.<\/li>\n<li>9. Pike, John. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.globalsecurity.org\/military\/ops\/gomex.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201cGulf of Mexico Exercise. (GOMEX)\u201d<\/a> GlobalSecurity.<\/li>\n<li>10.\u00a0Journalist 2<sup>nd<\/sup> Class, Barber, Barrie,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.navy.mil\/submit\/display.asp?story_id=14004\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> \u201cRIMPAC 2004 Packs a Punch In Joint Exercise Near Hawaii.\u201d<\/a> U.S. Navy.<\/li>\n<li>11.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.public.navy.mil\/surflant\/cg69\/Pages\/BattleE.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201cBattle \u201cE\u201d Award (White).\u201d<\/a> U.S. Navy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Further Reading<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/USS_Defender_(MCM-2)\">USS_Defender_(MCM-2)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.marinettemarine.com\/data%20sheets\/MCM_WebReady2015.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">U.S. NAVY Avenger Class Mine Countermeasure Vessels: MCM 2, MCM 4, &amp; MCM 7<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The USS Defender (MCM-2) was a naval Avenger-class mine countermeasures ship constructed at Marinette Mariner Corp. In Marinette Wisconsin.\u00a0 The USS Defender was the second of 14 new Avenger class mine countermeasures ships designed to be used as ocean minesweepers&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/2016\/12\/06\/uss-defender-mcm-2\/\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">USS Defender (MCM-2)<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":201,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[63,378,42,43],"class_list":["post-4004","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-naval","tag-1980s","tag-mcm","tag-navy","tag-wisconsin","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4004","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/201"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4004"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4004\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8633,"href":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4004\/revisions\/8633"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4004"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4004"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ss.sites.mtu.edu\/mhugl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4004"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}